$4.075 Million Car Accident Settlement

After a long and hard battle to uncover the truth about the car accident, we obtained a $4.075 million settlement for our client a few days before trial was scheduled to begin. Fault for the collision was originally unclear, but our client was paralyzed from the waist down, so we dug in for a fight because we knew he needed our help.

Here is the story.

Police Report

Our client was a rear-seat passenger in a black Kia Sportage heading south on Northside Drive through its intersection with MLK Jr. Drive in Atlanta, Georgia. The defendant was driving north through the same intersection in a gold Chevrolet Tahoe. The collision occurred in intersection, but it was unclear (at first) who was at fault.

Picture of car after accident — This is the Kia Sportage in which our client was a passenger at the time of the collision.

Early in the case, we obtained and looked at the police report. According to the police report, the Kia Sportage was turning left in the intersection, and the Tahoe was going straight. In other words, according to the police report, the car accident occurred as shown in blue in the diagram below. That was bad for our client because the driver of the Sportage had absconded and apparently gone into hiding. We never could find him, and our client could not effectively collect from him.

Diagram of accident — This is a diagram of the two different versions of the collision. The version from the police report is in blue, and the version from the eyewitnesses is in red. “P” stands for Plaintiff (i.e., our client), and “D” stands for Defendant (i.e., the driver of the Tahoe).

But a police report isn’t the be-all, end-all piece of evidence. Occasionally, the police get it wrong. We started digging in.

Finding Witnesses to the Collision

First, we called the only uninvolved eyewitness that had been listed in the police report. We left a message and called again. And again. And sent letters. And knocked on her door. Finally, on our second trip to her apartment, we got to talk to the witness. “Witness 1,” as we’ll refer to her here, did not want to be involved in our case. But she agreed to hear us out, and we explained that our client was a 19-year-old kid who was paralyzed from the waist down who really needed someone to tell the truth. She said she’d talk to us for ten minutes. Then she told us something really important – she said that the Tahoe had not been going straight through the intersection after all, but instead the Tahoe had been turning left, as shown in red in the diagram above. Not only that, she said that the Tahoe had been trying to turn left but was behind a slower-moving car, so the Tahoe swerved to the right around that car, and then cut back to the left to make a reckless turn in front of the Sportage. This was big news. We immediately obtained a written witness statement from Witness 1. Here is a link to that witness statement, with the most important parts shown in the excerpt below.

We kept working. After getting in touch with Witness 1, we sat down with the police officer who had written the report, even though we were starting to believe that the police report was wrong. It turned out that the officer had a notebook in which he’d written the name and phone number of two other witnesses, but had not put their names in his report! Thankfully, the officer still had the paper notebook. We contacted the next two witnesses – we’ll call them Witness 2 and Witness 3– and after lots of following up, leaving messages, and knocking on doors, we got in touch with both of them.

They agreed with Witness 1 and disagreed with the police report. They remembered the Tahoe waiting in the left-turn lane, then impatiently swerving to the right around a vehicle in front of it, then recklessly turning back to the left and speeding into the intersection. In other words, they supported the version of the accident shown in red in the diagram above. This was huge news for our client.

We immediately confirmed their testimony. If you’re a lawyer talking with witnesses who may be reluctant to be involved, you have to move fast and take whatever kind of confirmation the witness is willing and able to provide. Witness 2 was more cooperative, so we typed up a sworn affidavit for him to review and sign (link here, and excerpt below). Witness 3 was harder to get ahold of, so Jeb recorded a verbal witness statement on his phone and then we had the verbal statement transcribed later.

Excerpt from the affidavit of Witness 2.

Excerpt from the transcript of the verbal statement of Witness 3.

With our evidence in place, we felt confident that we could prove to the jury that the police officer had made a mistake, and the driver of the Tahoe was really at fault for the collision.

About Our Client

We had the pleasure of representing a wonderful client, who we’ll call “Mike” for purposes of this webpage. Mike had gone through a terrible tragedy. He was 19 years old at the time of the collision, and was working toward a professional dance career. He was really talented. He was also a natural performer, and had done some singing and modeling as well. But dancing was his real talent.

Obviously the car accident, spinal cord injury, and paralysis ended that. But Mike stayed positive. He was young and of course he experienced grief and anger. But he dealt with those emotions, kept working to stay as mobile as he could, and kept living his life.

Mike was a pleasure to work for. We admired him greatly.

Our client went through hardship that most of us could never imaging, but always stayed positive. This picture of our client hangs on Jeb’s wall.

Before the car accident, our client had been a very good dancer with the possibility of a professional future.

Our client did some modeling before the car accident.

Our client was a natural performer. Here he performs in front of his high school.

After his spinal injury, our client kept working hard to stay fit and strong.

Our client kept performing even after the car accident and spinal injury put him in a wheelchair.

Our client received medical treatment at the Shepherd Center in Atlanta, Georgia, which is the nation’s best medical treatment facility for paralysis and spinal cord injuries. They take their patients on trips and excursions to keep their spirits up, and took our client deer hunting – something he’d never done before. And he killed a deer!

Settlement of the Car Accident Case

We did what good lawyers do – we got ready for trial. Eventually, somewhere deep in the hallways of the insurance company, someone put two and two together. They realized they were in trouble, and started asking us to settle the case.

The trial was set to begin on Tuesday morning. New defense lawyers appeared in the case and started calling and emailing. Late on the Saturday night before trial, while Jeb was in the office preparing his opening statement, the insurance company finally offered enough money that Mike decided to accept it. The at-fault driver’s insurance company paid $4 million (way above the insurance policy limits) to settle the case, and we also collected $75,000 in UM insurance, making for a total recovery of $4.075 million.